Browser Fingerprint & Disguise Score

Nine fingerprint categories plus a six-dimension consistency score, all computed in your browser.

Disguise Score

Runs in your browser · nothing uploaded
Evaluating…

Weighted across 6 consistency dimensions (max 100)

Timezone matches IP location20 ptsMismatch lets sites infer your real region
Checking
Language matches IP location20 ptsBrowser language exposes your real region
Checking
WebRTC real IP hidden20 ptsWebRTC can bypass proxies and leak local IPs
Checking
DNS exit matches proxy20 ptsDirect DNS queries expose your real network
Checking
Exit IP is residential10 ptsDatacenter IPs are flagged by risk engines
Checking
UA platform is consistent10 ptsConflicts between language, timezone and UA expose spoofing
Checking
Fingerprint digest (9 items)View details
HSTS
WebGL
Canvas
Plugins
Rects
Fonts
Audio
WebGPU
Media

Fingerprints are computed locally in your browser; the server receives none of them · How to improve your score

UA & Device Info

Reading local environment…

What makes your browser unique

Even with no cookies, the combination of your GPU (WebGL renderer), Canvas rendering quirks, installed fonts, plugin list, audio stack behavior and screen metrics forms a fingerprint that identifies your browser among millions. This page computes a digest of nine categories locally.

The disguise score

Beyond raw fingerprints, the score evaluates consistency: does your timezone match your IP location, does your browser language, is WebRTC hidden, does DNS follow the same exit. A self-consistent environment is what risk engines trust — and what this tool helps you verify and fix.

Nothing leaves your browser

Every check runs locally. The server never receives your fingerprint — only an aggregated, anonymous count of checks is kept for the site-wide Network Pulse statistics.

Need the in-depth Chinese version? Read the full guide.

Related articles

More in the blog index

Frequently asked questions

Is a "rare" fingerprint bad?

Rarity makes you more trackable but is not inherently suspicious. Millions of real users have uncommon GPU/font combinations. Risk engines weigh rarity together with consistency signals.

Can I make my fingerprint more common?

Fingerprint-spoofing browsers (and some privacy extensions) present randomized or popular configurations. Beware: a bad spoof creates internal contradictions — a Mac UA with Windows fonts — which is worse than no spoofing.

Why do results change between reloads?

Randomized spoofing extensions intentionally re-roll fingerprints. If values change without any extension, the metric is environment-dependent (e.g. audio floats) — the stable categories are the ones that matter.

Does incognito mode change my fingerprint?

Only marginally — it clears storage and cookies but keeps GPU, fonts, screen and audio characteristics. Fingerprinting defeats incognito by design.